Which is better for business automation: n8n, Make or Zapier?
The right platform depends on your volume, your data rules and who will maintain the integration after we leave. All three connect hundreds of common business apps, and all three can call almost any API through an HTTP step. They differ in how they bill, where they run and how much code they tolerate.
| Zapier | Make | n8n | Custom code | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Zapier cloud only | Make cloud only | n8n Cloud, or self-hosted on your server | Your cloud account |
| Billing unit | Tasks (each successful action) | Credits (most module runs use 1) | Executions on Cloud; no execution fee self-hosted | Hosting only |
| Best owner after handover | Non-technical ops staff | Ops staff comfortable with logic | Technical ops or an engineer | An engineer |
| Strong at | Breadth of connectors, fast setup | Visual branching and data mapping at low cost | High volume, code steps, data kept in-house | Complex logic, strict performance needs |
| Watch for | Cost at high task volumes | Credit use in loops over large lists | Patching and backups when self-hosted | Every change needs a developer |
Make moved its billing from operations to credits in August 2025 (Make help center (opens in a new tab)). n8n's free Community Edition can be self-hosted, while features such as SSO, environments and Git-based version control need a paid plan (n8n docs (opens in a new tab)).
Our default: Zapier for small, low-volume flows owned by non-technical staff, Make for mid-volume logic, n8n when volume, cost or data location matters. The longer comparison, with worked cost examples, is in n8n vs Make vs Zapier.
